And another way to look at it is that China is just trying to duck any
responsibility in this regard.

But on a broader level I am surprised to read that you seem to be giving
China the latitude to achieve a western standard of living before dealing
with consumption. (And if China, then why not all developing countries?)
Every projection I have seen suggests that is much too late. Earth does not
have the resources etc. etc.

Growth that does not follow the western model seems to be the key. Yes, I
know that is a very difficult issue and no, I do not have the answer. It
just seems that you, and all of us, should be looking for that answer rather
than excusing China in this process.

Regards,
Daniel L. Tufford, Ph.D.
University of South Carolina
Department of Biological Sciences
209A Sumwalt                    (office)
701 Sumter St, Room 401    (mail)
Columbia, SC 29208
Ph. 803-777-3292, Fx: 803-777-3292
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://www.biol.sc.edu/~tufford
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Dietz
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 12:02 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Climate Change and Economic Growth

Check out these quotes from Su Wei, a member of the Chinese delegation at 
the U.N. Climate Change Conference in Bali:

"I just wonder whether it's fair to ask developing countries like China to 
take on binding targets or mandatory targets.  I think there is much room 
for the United States to think whether it's possible to change (its) 
lifestyle and consumption patterns in order to contribute to the 
protection of the global climate."

"China is in the process of industrialization and there is a need for 
economic growth to meet the basic needs of the people and fight against 
poverty."

"China is acting. We will do what we should and what we can do.  All we 
care for is the well-being and the future of mankind."

Su seems to be advocating that the U.S. and other wealthy nations stop 
obsessing over economic growth (i.e., move toward a steady state economy), 
and that poorer nations follow a short-term policy of growth before 
stabilizing economic conditions.

This line of thinking is right in step with the position on economic 
growth being proposed in ESA.  We won't see much action on abating climate 
change if we don't address economic growth around the globe.

Thanks,
Rob Dietz, Executive Director
Center for the Advancement of the Steady State Economy
www.steadystate.org

Reply via email to