Any statement on economic growth should EXPLICITLY refer to human
population and population growth in the SAME statement.

FAILURE to mention the problem of human population growth as THE driver
of economic growth (as witnessed in the prolix, potential E.S.A. policy
statement circulated on this list the other day) will render the
statement otiose and near-useless.

Your message itself reads somewhat like insipid bureaucratic waffle.
Surely, from fundamental ecological canons, the premise of exponential,
infinite (economic) growth against a base of finite resources is simply
impossible? What more scientifically and ecologically can there be left
to cogitate over in your multifarious committees?

Can an outsider (i.e. non-ESA member) and amateur ecologist (i.e.
non-professional) such as myself possibly divine in your email that the
real reasons for E.S.A. foot-dragging on this important issue are
actually more of a political and sociological flavour, and the wish to
avoid "controversy"?



-----Original Message-----
From: Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nadine Lymn
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 4:02 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re ESA and Economic Growth Statement

Dear Ecologers,

There have been several postings over the last months urging the
Ecological Society of America to consider issuing a position statement
on economic growth.  In addition, a group of ecologists submitted a
request to the Governing Board in August, followed by additional letters
of interest supporting such a statement.  

The ESA Governing Board is taking this interest seriously and has asked
the Society's Public Affairs Committee to oversee the development of a
position statement for its consideration and review. 

This process is underway and there will be an opportunity for interested
members to offer feedback to the proposed statement.  In addition, the
Public Affairs Office has been collecting the many letters that have
already come in offering views on this topic.

As with all the Society's position statements, ESA takes very seriously
the task of producing documents that are carefully reviewed and
appropriately reflect the underlying science and the Ecological Society
of America.  We will notify this list when a draft is available for
comment and appreciate the interest in this topic.

Nadine Lymn
ESA Director of Public Affairs

Reply via email to