H11 - Historic Hydrologic Synthesis: Quantifying the Past to Understand the 
Future (AGU Fall Meeting, 15-19 December 2008)

Please consider submitting your AGU abstract to H11 - Historic Hydrologic 
Synthesis: Quantifying the Past to Understand the Future.  We are planning 
an exciting, cross-cutting session and particularly encourage presentations 
on research at the intersection of historical hydrology and geomorphology 
or biogeochemistry.  Please feel free to contact the conveners with 
questions.

Description: Quantifying and evaluating future hydrologic change requires 
an integration of process across a range of time scales. In the present and 
recent past, our understanding of hydrology has been advanced by the 
ability to measure hydrologic variables at high frequencies, but our 
ability to understand hydrologic changes and longer-term (i.e. 
intergenerational) processes over the past several hundred years is 
rudimentary at best. While construction of hydrologic models for historic 
periods challenges our conventional thinking due to a lack of data for 
calibration, these periods remain our best repository of information on 
slower oscillations in our hydrologic systems and deserve further 
attention. Quantification of historical hydrologic, sediment, and 
biogeochemical cycling relies on proxies and synthetic bodies of evidence, 
rather than controlled experimental systems. This session will focus on 
emerging work synthesizing historic hydrologic information within the late-
Holocene and across spatial scales. In particular, we invite presentations 
addressing or raising the important questions arising from synthetic work, 
such as: Are pre-European settlement conditions in the United States 
appropriate or desirable design criteria for contemporary hydrologic 
management?; Have historical decisions produced system legacies that may 
hinder water management?; Are our measures of hydrologic resilience 
effective and meaningful when viewed with historical context?

Jennifer Arrigo
East Carolina University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Daniel Bain
University of Pittsburgh
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Mark Green
University of New Hampshire
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Brian Pellerin
US Geological Survey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to