Was he complaining about this study as being an "earmark" ? I don't
remember that particular complaint and of course support more funding for
ecological research, but I don't think we should be supporting earmarks
for ecological studies or for anything else!


> Dear Ecologgers-
> I was very disappointed to hear presidential candidate Sen. John McCain
> clearly state during the first nationally televised debate that a 3
> million dollar study on bear DNA in Montana was a waste of money.  I do
> not know which study he was referring to, but to me this statement makes
> it very clear how much McCain values ecological research.  The government
> spent 2,730 billion dollars in 2007.  The 3 million dollar study accounted
> for about 0.0001% of the total spending.  It seems that if the pittance
> spent on ecological research (relative to total spending) is reduced in
> this country, our natural systems will continue to go misunderstood or
> unknown, to the detriment of our citizens.
>
> If the PI's of the study mentioned care to express their concern, and the
> scientific value of the study, I would be happy to support and encourage a
> petition to Sen. McCain concerning the value of ecological research.  If
> the PI's used part of the money to buy a Hummer to cruise the Montana
> backcountry, I would agree with Sen. McCain.
>
> Sincerely,
> Matthew Warren
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to