Just a thought on this letter: is there really a need for the United States of America to have a "population policy?" Why not a "consumption policy?" As noted in the population paragraph, the majorly skewed part of the (population * per capita consumption) term in the U.S.A. is the per capita consumption part. I don't have numbers to back this up, but have heard anecdotally that population growth in most "developed"/materially rich countries is decreasing and/or has leveled off already. I have also heard that the U.S.A., compared to other "developed" nations does have a higher growth rate, but I would venture that much of this can be attributed to immigration (?) especially in recent years/decades. I would love to see some links/facts from someone who knows more about this than I do.
Globally, sure there are parts of the world where exploding populations and availability resources to meet the needs of those population concentrations are of great concern, but I - personally - don't think that an administrative "population policy" from Obama (or any of our "leaders") is the most appropriate way to address population growth in other nations that are situated outside our national jurisdiction (if anything is outside of that). To me - when you say "population policy," that will translate to "can't have babies" in a lot of people's minds, which is a political bomb. That is not to say I think it isn't a concern at all for the U.S.A., we definitely need to educate women (as well as the men who fertilize those women) in general and also specifically as to reproductive matters, while working with other nations to address population growth globally, but I think couching that kind of policy in (or introducing that paragraph as) a national population-control sort o! f argument is self-defeating, in political terms. I - personally - think we'd be better off focusing our limited (moreso by the day) resources on the per capita part of our impact term. Also, I think any federally-mandated/presidential policy type of effort will have limited efficacy in any arena without local action, so go hand out condoms, but don't buy as many! ;) Discussion? -----Original Message----- From: Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chase D. Mendenhall Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 6:11 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [ECOLOG-L] Co-sign LETTER TO OBAMA FROM ONE OF EARTH'S LEADING ECOLOGISTS (Stephen R. Carpenter) SIGN This Letter: http://www.gopetition.com/online/23266.html This letter was sent and thought to be received by President-Elect Barack Obama from leading ecologist Stephen R. Carpenter. This petition is simply to support the gravity of Dr. Carpenter's advice to save our life support systems. Please sign and forward on to demonstrate your support for these basic, but necessary national priorities for Brack Obama's presidency. The objective of this petitions is to organize citizens who support Stephen R. Carpenter's position of saving human life support systems, emphasize the urgency of the situation to the Obama administration and draw attention to the seemingly unnoticed 1,300 leading scientists' consensus report. Used with permission of Stephen R. Carpenter. http://www.gopetition.com/online/23266.html November 2008-- Dear President-Elect Obama, Congratulations on your election, which has created a sense of optimism in America that has never occurred before in my lifetime. Yet earth's life support systems have deteriorated more in our lifetimes than in any other era of human history. With earth's population increasing, and consumption per person growing much faster than population, humans are heating the climate, polluting air and water, degrading landscapes and turning coastal oceans to dead zones. America's food supply depends on a few fragile crops, grown using practices that degrade soil, air and water to yield foods of low nutritional value that harm our health. The U.S. is not investing in the education and innovation needed to create agriculture and energy technologies that can get us through the 21st century. Details are found in a consensus report of more than 1300 leading scientists from more than 90 nations including the U.S. (http://www.MAweb.org). These findings support the following priorities for your presidency. Decrease America's dependency on coal and oil and increase the supply of energy from non-polluting technologies: We must decrease emission of greenhouse gases, and the era of cheap oil is over. We must accelerate development of clean energy technologies using wind, sun and tides. These investments must be based on scientific information to avoid bogus remedies, such as grain biofuels, that sound good but do not in fact solve the problem. We must increase conservation through better buildings, efficient transportation, and renewal of industry. We must improve agriculture and forestry practices to reduce energy consumption and increase carbon storage in soil. Stop subsidizing agriculture that destroys land, water and health. Create incentives for agriculture that maintains land and water resources and yields healthy food: Agriculture must shift to practices that use less energy for tillage and transport of food, produce healthy food for local consumption, train more people in diverse farming practices, build soil instead of degrading and eroding it, and maintain clean water and air. These reforms can be accomplished by reforming federal subsidies. Have a population policy: In global impact, the U.S. is the world's most overpopulated nation, mainly because of our high per-capita consumption. Our population is growing rapidly. Global population growth is a key driver of degraded land, water, air and climate. Education of women is a powerful lever to restrain population growth. If all the world's women are educated to high-school level, human impact on our life-support system will be more than 30% lower by 2050. As a father of daughters, it is especially appropriate for you to support education for all of the world's women. Invest in the education and innovation needed to create a society that could thrive in the 21st century and beyond: Even though our universities and research centers are the envy of the world, science education of the general population of the U.S. is weak and must be made stronger. Education must be reformed to encourage creativity. There are enormous opportunities for innovations in agriculture, energy, and infrastructure that will lead to a moderate climate, rich landscapes, and clean air and water into the future. These technological opportunities are being seized by other nations while the U.S. lags behind. We must restore American leadership in creating technology that maintains our life support system while providing the energy, food and shelter that people need. Sincerely yours, Steve Carpenter Stephen Alfred Forbes Professor of Zoology Center for Limnology University of Wisconsin Madison, Wisconsin 53706 USA SIGN THIS LETTER: http://www.gopetition.com/online/23266.html
