By 2022???
THat is the same year that Soylent Green takes place!
SOYLENT GREEN IS PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

we will get there yet!

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 3:50 PM, William Silvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Given the heated discussion about biofuels on this list, the following 
> editorial from the NY Times may be of interest.
>
> November 18, 2008
> Editorial
> Honesty About Ethanol
> One of the 2007 energy bill's most ambitious provisions - the ethanol mandate 
> - has turned out to be its most troublesome. The provision would boost 
> ethanol production from 7-plus billion gallons today to 36 billion gallons by 
> 2022. In practical terms, this means doubling the production of corn ethanol 
> until advanced forms of ethanol and other biofuels kick in.
>
> Corn ethanol came under fire earlier this year when evidence mounted that the 
> diversion of cropland from food to fuel had contributed to the spike in 
> worldwide food prices. What is less clear is whether corn ethanol is good or 
> bad for the planet - whether it emits fewer or more greenhouse gas emissions 
> than conventional gasoline. The answer turns on how you measure emissions.
>
> Congress stipulated that ethanol be cleaner than gasoline and handed the job 
> of measuring emissions to the Environmental Protection Agency, which has 
> found itself under ferocious pressure. The ethanol industry wants its product 
> shown in the best possible light. Environmentalists want an honest 
> accounting, which the public deserves but which they do not think an 
> industry-friendly Bush administration is capable of.
>
> The most contentious question involves the emissions caused by direct and 
> indirect changes in land use associated with growing biofuels. Until late 
> last year, corn ethanol had been seen as at least carbon neutral - and thus 
> much cleaner than gasoline - because the greenhouse gases it absorbed while 
> growing canceled out the gases it emitted during combustion. This made it a 
> win-win fuel - even a win-win-win fuel - because it also encouraged the 
> construction of ethanol refineries in the American heartland and eased, to 
> some extent, America's dependence on imported oil.
>
> But then came a spate of new studies arguing that earlier calculations had 
> failed to account for the emissions caused when land is cleared and tilled, 
> releasing large quantities of stored carbon. In particular, the studies said, 
> the earlier scenarios had overlooked the indirect or ripple effects of 
> ethanol production - the carbon released when the diversion of land from food 
> to fuel in the Corn Belt causes farmers elsewhere in the world to clear 
> untouched land to make up for the loss.
>
> The studies also said that some biofuels - waste material, forest residues, 
> certain grasses - can be produced without harmful changes in land use and 
> with benefit to the atmosphere. But the indirect effects of converting food 
> crops to fuel production were found to cause net increases in emissions in 
> almost every case.
>
> The industry says that such indirect effects are impossible to measure and 
> that the studies are premature. One industry group has asked the E.P.A. to 
> ignore them entirely. But it seems clear on its face that some land-use 
> changes - e.g., cutting down rain forests to plant crops - would have 
> seriously negative effects.
>
> In any case, it is the E.P.A.'s duty under the law to give the most unbiased, 
> accurate accounting it can. The issue here is the fate of the planet, not the 
> fate of a particular industry.
>



-- 
Malcolm L. McCallum
Associate Professor of Biology
Texas A&M University-Texarkana
Editor, Herpetological Conservation and Biology
http://www.herpconbio.org

Summer Teaching Schedule & Office Hours:
Ecology: M,W 1-2:40 pm
Cell Biology: M 6-9:40 pm (don't ask!)
Forensic Science: T,R 10-11:40am
Office Hours:  MW 12-1, 5-6, TR 11:40-12:30,

1880's: "There's lots of good fish in the sea"   W.S. Gilbert
1990's:  Many fish stocks depleted due to overfishing, habitat loss,
        and pollution.
2000:  Marine reserves, ecosystem restoration, and pollution reduction
        MAY help restore populations.
2022: Soylent Green is People!

Reply via email to