I think that this is a great step forward, as is the discussion of digital publishing in Ryan McEwan's posted link. I would like to add a related point to this discussion.

More and more often conferences are the venue for primary or secondary publications. It used to be that at a conference one just presented research in progress and exchanged ideas, but institutions now often refuse to pay your way unless you present a final publication. This creates publishing pressure, and since the organisers usually have made advance commitments to publishers they can only accept a fixed number of pages. Often they underestimate the supply of publishable research, with the result that some good papers are not accepted.

I recall one such conference which proved far more popular than anyone expected, and only about one third of the acceptable papers were actually accepted for publication. I suggested to the editor that the rest be pulished on a website if the authors wished, but he was totally contemptuous of the idea. Since then I think that digital publishing has become more acceptable, but a major concern is whether it earns brownie points for the authors - will it help them in the job market?

From a scientific point of view I think that web publishing, especially open
access, is a great step forward. Many scientists, myself included, put their papers on the web whether or not they have appeared in printed journals (and if the PDF is not available, I post the manuscript in HTML). The journals that permit comments and other forms of feedback are really adding a new dimension to scientific communication. But we also need to ensure that there is a good infrastructure in place so that scientists who publish on the web can keep their jobs!

Bill Silvert
http://bill.silvert.org


----- Original Message ----- From: "Thiago Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 2:28 AM
Subject: [ECOLOG-L] [Re: [ECOLOG-L] Fwd: Publish and be wrong?]


Very interesting read indeed. I recently came across the Biogeosciences journal (http://www.biogeosciences.net/index.html), and I really like their proposed model for publication...

Reply via email to