I DID thorougly mess up the quote!  It should have been: "The more you 
GENERALIZE about a population, the less you know about any individual in that 
population."  Using "know" is a bit unfair, but depending upon what one knows 
more of, I suppose, both statements might be true. 

Sorry,

WT

PS: I quite agree about the outliers. 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jonathan Blythe" <[email protected]>
To: "Wayne Tyson" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 6:13 AM
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] STATISTICS Help again and thanks for all the recent help


> Unlikely since the statistical unit is often the x measured from an  
> individual.  x can be for example size or age.  As the percentage of  
> individuals sampled from a population reaches 100%, which approaches  
> complete knowledge of a population, you would in-fact know the value  
> for the x variable for any given individual.  Perhaps you are  
> misquoting, or at least taking this phrase out of context?
> There are at least two contexts that might justify such a phrase: 1.  
> in the case that we have limited time or resources to collect  
> information on a population, then we would have to choose between the  
> number of individuals sampled , N, or the number of variables measured  
> from each individual, x; 2. Often the outliers are the most  
> interesting individuals in a population.  If the latter is the  
> meaning, then I would substitute the words "any individual" with "a  
> certain individual."
> 
> 
> On Feb 19, 2009, at 7:15 PM, Wayne Tyson wrote:
> 
>> Thanks again to everyone who helped with my recent enquiry about  
>> tolerance ranges and their mirror-images in the habitat fun-house.
>>
>> Now, begging your endulgence once again, can anyone help me with  
>> background on or explanation of this statistical dictum? Again, I'm  
>> working with a fading memory, so I may not remember the exact  
>> phrasing.
>>
>> "The more you know about a population, the less you know about any  
>> individual in that population."
>>
>> Gratefully,
>> WT
>>
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.1/1962 - Release Date: 02/20/09 
07:26:00

Reply via email to