When I saw this in yesterday's paper I wondered about posting it to the
list, since there is so much discussion about recycling. Then on the TV this
morning there was a story about waste collectors in Cairo who are being
devastated by government policy - they are members of the Christian minority
who feed pigs on waste and sell them as a large part of their income, and
the government had all the pigs killed to halt swine flu even though there
was no evidence of infection in Egyptian pigs. As a result, the edible
garbage is piling up in the streets and the vermin population is exploding.
And the children of the waste collectors are suffering from malnutrition
because the poverty of their families has gotten much worse.

The two stories point up a little-known aspect of recycling, that it is
largely the domain of the poorest and most despised members of society who
are at the mercy of forces beyond their control and subject to arbitrary
from government and from economic pressures. Yet they form an essential
component of the human ecosystem and play a vital role in recycling and thus
in resource management.

I suspect that the members of this list know more about dung beetles and
other detritivores than about the humans who have the same function. In Addo
Elephant Park there are signs all over the place warning drivers to slow
down and look out for dung beetles, but I have never seen any evidence of
similar concern for people who struggle to keep our cities clean. Maybe they
deserve some thought and attention.

Bill Silvert

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

August 5, 2009
NY Times Op-Ed Contributor
A Scrap of Decency
By BHARATI CHATURVEDI
Delhi, India

AMONG those suffering from the global recession are millions of workers who
are not even included in the official statistics: urban recyclers - the
trash pickers, sorters, traders and reprocessors who extricate paper,
cardboard and plastics from garbage heaps and prepare them for reuse. Their
work is both unrecorded and largely unrecognized, even though in some parts
of the world they handle as much as 20 percent of all waste.

The world's 15 million informal recyclers clean up cities, prevent some
trash from ending in landfills, and even reduce climate change by saving
energy on waste disposal techniques like incineration.

They also recycle waste much more cheaply and efficiently than governments
or corporations can, and in many cities in the developing world, they
provide the only recycling services.

But as housing values and the cost of oil have fallen worldwide, so too has
the price of scrap metal, paper and plastic. From India to Brazil to the
Philippines, recyclers are experiencing a precipitous drop in income. Trash
pickers and scrap dealers in Minas Gerais State in Brazil, for example, saw
a decline of as much as 80 percent in the price of old magazines and 81
percent for newspapers, and a 77 percent drop in the price of cardboard from
October 2007 to last December.

In the Philippines, many scrap dealers have shuttered so quickly that
researchers at the Solid Waste Management Association of the Philippines
didn't have a chance to record their losses.

In Delhi, some 80 percent of families in the informal recycling business
surveyed by my organization said they had cut back on "luxury foods," which
they defined as fruit, milk and meat. About 41 percent had stopped buying
milk for their children. By this summer, most of these children, already
malnourished, hadn't had a glass of milk in nine months. Many of these
children have also cut down on hours spent in school to work alongside their
parents.

Families have liquidated their most valuable assets - primarily copper from
electrical wires - and have stopped sending remittances back to their rural
villages. Many have also sold their emergency stores of grain. Their misery
is not as familiar as that of the laid-off workers of imploding
corporations, but it is often more tragic.

Few countries have adopted emergency measures to help trash pickers. Brazil,
for one, is providing recyclers, or "catadores," with cheaper food, both
through arrangements with local farmers and by offering food subsidies.
Other countries, with the support of nongovernmental organizations and donor
agencies, should follow Brazil's example. Unfortunately, most trash pickers
operate outside official notice and end up falling through the cracks of
programs like these.

A more efficient temporary solution would be for governments to buoy the
buying price of scrap. To do this, they'd have to pay a small subsidy to
waste dealers so they could purchase scrap from trash pickers at about 20
percent above the current price. This increase, if well advertised and
broadly utilized, would bring recyclers back from the brink.

In the long run, though, these invisible workers will remain especially
vulnerable to economic slowdowns unless they are integrated into the formal
business sector, where they can have insurance and reliable wages.

This is not hard to accomplish. Informal junk shops should have to apply for
licenses, and governments should create or expand doorstep waste collection
programs to employ trash pickers. Instead of sorting through haphazard trash
heaps and landfills, the pickers would have access to the cleaner scrap that
comes straight from households and often brings a higher price. Employing
the trash pickers at this step would ensure that recyclables wouldn't have
to be lugged to landfills in the first place.

Experienced trash pickers, once incorporated into the formal economy, would
recycle as efficiently as they always have, but they'd gain access to
information on global scrap prices and would be better able to bargain for
fair compensation. Governments should charge households a service fee, which
would also supplement the trash pickers' income, and provide them with an
extra measure of insurance against future crises.

Their labor makes our cities healthier and more livable. We all stand to
gain by making sure that the work of recycling remains sustainable for years
to come.

Bharati Chaturvedi is the founder and director of the Chintan Environmental
Research and Action Group. Copyright 2009 The New York Times Company

Reply via email to