Jeremy,

Think of it this way, *post-doc 1* is going to pay you to learn new skills.
Is *post-doc 2* too going to permit you to add to your skill set? To echo
what Robin said, keep in mind the time-frame of a typical postdoc (1-3
years). With your vastly expanded skill-set you could seek a (relatively)
more permanent faculty position with the geographical attributes that you
desire.

And to echo Lionel (and this is reminiscent of my choice of the post-doc
position I am currently in), *post-doc 1* is your proverbial 'bird in the
hand'. Like you said you have the 'right of refusal' for *postdoc-1*. At
this point you have nothing for *post-doc2*.

Good luck,
Milind Bunyan

On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:07:37 -0400, Robin Warne <[email protected]> wrote:

>Hi Jeremy,
>
>I am a postdoc currently.  Lionel's advice is very sound; the job market
>at both the post-doc and faculty level are very competitive.  I would
>add, that if you end up having a choice that your decision should be
>largely based upon your ultimate goals.  If you are aiming for a faculty
>position at a research university, than you should choose the post-doc
>that will provide you with the best prospects for high productivity; not
>to mention provide you with the tools and experience that will allow you
>to do the science you see yourself doing for the next 3-5 years (and
>beyond).  In this context the higher salary and comfort is less
>relevant, because they only last for 1-3 years (which fly by very quickly).
>
>But these points only matter if you have a choice.
>
>Best of luck,
>Robin Warne
>
>Lionel Pawlowski wrote:
>> Dear Jeremy,
>>
>> I had the privilege to be both post-doc and recruiter for post-doc.
>> There's no straight answer to that because it also depends on the job
>> market in field of research.
>>
>> In your position, I would accept post-doc 1 if the job market is bad
>> and you find the offer suitable. If on that market, that offer is not
>> that great in terms of location, perspective and salary, I would
>> decline the offer on post-doc 1 and rather wait to see the result from
>> post-doc 2. But keep in mind that higher salary may increase the
>> competition for this position.
>>
>> If you want to play it safe, you should consider accepting post-doc 1.
>> If you think you can have better, you should consider waiting for
>> post-doc 2 and apply for post-docs 3,4,5 in the meantime...
>>
>> About asking for some delays for offer 1, you can try. But it's always
>> a mess to deal with, from my perspective of recruiter, with people
>> asking delays in a world where projects have deadlines. Some
>> recruiters don't like that (because it means you are actually seeking
>> for something better), some other don't mind.
>>
>> Good luck
>>
>> Lionel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2010/3/19 Jeremy L. Conkle <[email protected]>:
>>
>>> I am completing my PhD this spring and have been applying for post-docs.  I
>>> have a dilemma and I would like to ask the all knowing ECO-LOG if they have
>>> some good advice for me.
>>>
>>> I have been offered one post-doc (we will call it *post-doc 1*) doing
>>> research that is in line with what I do, and also will expand my knowledge
>>> base drastically. However, I have also recently interviewed for another
>>> post-doc (which we will call *post-doc 2*) that will also be great for me
>>> and is closer to family and in a place I would love to live. It also pays
>>> almost 2x as much. Basically *post-doc 2* is my first choice, but *post-doc
>>> 1* is also a great option.
>>>
>>> The professor at *post-doc 1* needs an answer asap, because the position
>>> needs to be filled soon. He gave me time to figure out *post-doc 2* or until
>>> he found another suitable candidate.  He found another candidate and now
>>> needs an answer, so he is giving me first right of refusal.  I won't
>>> officially hear back from *post-doc 2* until early April.  I sent the
>>> researcher I interviewed with  at *post-doc 2 *an e-mail to explain my
>>> situation and to ask him let me know if I was at least still being
>>> considered for the position.  That way I could make a decision on *post-doc
>>> 1*.  I haven't heard back yet from my e-mail to *post-doc 2 *and I don't
>>> want to leave the *post-doc 1* professor hanging and potentially miss out on
>>> both opportunities.
>>>
>>> Do you have any suggestions.  I have been told that I should just accept
>>> *post-doc 1* and then back-out if I get *post-doc 2*.  I am not sure if this
>>> is the best course of action and I wanted to get some feedback?  I was
>>> thinking I should just send the *post-doc 1 *professor an e-mail explaining
>>> my situation and ask for a few more days while I wait for *post-doc 2 *to
>>> respond to my e-mail.
>>>
>>> Any help would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks.
>>>
>>> Jeremy Conkle
>>> --
>>> Jeremy Landon Conkle
>>> PhD Candidate
>>> Wetlands & Aquatic Biogeochemistry Lab
>>> Department of Oceanography & Coastal Sciences
>>> Energy, Coast & Environment Bldg, Rm 3221
>>> Louisiana State University
>>> p 225.578.1123 f 225.578.6423
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>> Lab Website:
>>> http://www.ocean.lsu.edu/whitelab/index.html
>>>
>>> MER Website:
>>> http://www.ocean.lsu.edu/mer/
>>>
>>>
>=========================================================================

Reply via email to