I am only joining the discussion now, but enterprises like Monsanto do raise 
concerns. There is a documentary on you tube that critically shows what is 
behind them and makes you think you don't want these kind of enterprises 
controlling our future agriculture market (and this is what they are after). It 
is scary.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hErvV5YEHkE



Annemarie



-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:23:28 -0700
> Von: Paul Cherubini <[email protected]>
> An: 
> Betreff: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Physiology Productivity Promises and BS Re: 
> [ECOLOG-L] worlds authorities in sustainable ag/meat/ag ecology

> Wayne Tyson wrote:
> 
> > What's the irrigation efficiency component of those statistics? Are
> > there any actual experimental data that compare strains under 
> > laboratory controls? I'm talking strictly about actual water consumption
> > per unit biomass or seed volume/weight, not field observations loaded
> > with variables and open to manipulation. But beyond that, upon what
> > theoretical foundation is the assertion that GMO alone performs these 
> > miracles, without any change in water and nutrients?
> 
> Wayne, the biotech companies have not claimed GMO alone will double 
> yields in 30 years while at the same time consuming fewer resources 
> (water, fertilizer, fossil fuel, land) and producing less carbon dioxide.
> 
> Monsanto explains the doubling of yields of corn, soybeans, cotton 
> and canola in 30 years can reasonably be accomplished via using a 
> combination of advanced Plant Breeding, Biotechnology and Agronomic 
> Practices
> http://www.monsanto.com/responsibility/sustainable-ag/new_vision_for_ag.asp
> 
> The American Soybean Association gets into some specifics in it's
> brochure on "Ten Reasons US Soybeans Are Sustainable"
> http://www.ussoyexports.org/resources/USSEC_sustainability.pdf
> 
> Examples from the brochure: 
> 
> a) Herbicide tolerant [GMO] soybeans enable farmers to practice
> no-till production.
> b) The no-till production method enables farms to reduce deep plowing
> and multiple soil cultivation operations with heavy equipment.
> c) The reduction in deep plowing reduces the loss of soil and moisture.
> d) No-till allows the residue from the previous crop to be left in the
> field which eventually degrades and thus increases the amount of 
> topsoil in the fields.
> e) Narrow row planting enables soybeans to grow so closely together
> they crowd out competing weeds and reduce soil moisture loss.
> f) Reduced need for heavy soil cultivation equipment reduces fossil
> fuel use and emissions and reduces soil compaction which in turn 
> is good for earthworm populations, soil moisture retention and 
> reduced water runoff into waterways.
> 
> Paul Cherubini
> El Dorado, Calif.

-- 
GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01

Reply via email to