1. I have received several replies to my comments under consideration in
this post by Kolb...only one reply accorded with my own views.
2. Since I was expressing personal perspectives, others are, it goes
without saying, equally free to express their own, including any
counterpoints.
3. Because of #2, I have little to say except to make the following
personal disclosure: *on balance*, I do not think highly of
American students (including many graduate students, post-docs, and
early-stage faculty) or their advocates. I have found too many of them to
be a grandiose, narcissistic, self-absorbed, complaining, "bratty" lot,
compared to many young people in other technological societies of which I
am aware.
4. I am in favor of, say, high school seniors taking a Special Forces
Survival Training course for many of the same reasons that young males and
females are required to serve a designated period of time in the Israeli
Army...for integrity-, sensitivity-, resilience-, preparedness-,
problem-solving, character-, and related training. *Rambo effects* pale in
comparison with (generalizable, life-changing, and task-ready) tactical-
and strategic-skills and all that these achievement-sets imply.




On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Suzanne Kolb <sk...@antioch.edu> wrote:

> I couldn't agree more with what Jason Hernandez had to say in reaction to
> Clara Jones' piece on experiential education and study abroad programs. The
> following is my response to Clara's statements:
>
> Antioch University's Brazilian Ecosystems program does not cater
> exclusively to financially privileged students. Yes, some students can
> write a single check to cover all program costs, but that is rare. The
> average student funds the program by stitching together federal financial
> aid, aid from their home institution, and summer job paychecks. We are also
> often able to provide tuition aid to the neediest applicants. Concerning
> your complaint about the questionable value of environmental education
> abroad programs, I can understand your disappointment with some of the
> less than academically credible programs on offer in this particular arena
> of education. They can be considered offensive given the urgency of the
> current biodiversity crisis. Perhaps you can understand how frustrating it
> is to be mistakenly included in that group. In fact, wrongful allegations
> in this regard can work against the power that strong education abroad
> programs have in transforming young students into professionals with
> important contributions to make towards biological conservation.
>
> Over the past fourteen years directing the Brazil program, I have learned
> that serious students are savvy consumers when deciding on a study abroad
> program. They ask for course syllabi, they contact past participants. The
> fingerprints of my education at Stony Brook University, the University of
> Georgia's Institute of Ecology (Odum School of Ecology), and my own
> participation in an Organization for Tropical Studies field course, are all
> over my development of the Brazilian Ecosystems program. And, in published
> descriptions, students easily identify this program as one that can
> effectively advance their post-graduate career goals in ecology and
> conservation.
>
> Antioch's 16-credit Brazilian Ecosystems program is a fully accredited
> university program that undergoes annual external and internal review and
> assessment. Schools such as Bard College, Amherst College, University of
> Wisconsin-Madison, Swarthmore College, Goucher College, among others,
> regularly enroll their students and continuously monitor the quality of the
> program.
>
> I posted your message on our Brazil program alumni listserv, asking them to
> reflect on the value of their semester of experiential learning. Their
> replies came streaming in within only an hour or so. They gave strong
> personal testimonies to the way in which their program experience uniquely
> catalyzed their post-graduate work in the fields of ecological research,
> environmental policy, natural resource management, environmental law, and
> science education. Almost all of them blanched at the thought of undergoing
> Special Forces Survival Training in order to potentially come into contact
> with environmental criminals, who are capable of armed violence. But you
> may be pleased to know that the Rambo route to habitat protection was
> tentatively appealing to two former students.
>
> I most definately support the idea that we find some way to quantitatively
> measure the impact of all environmental study abroad programs on the issues
> you list, as representing an environmental "payoff". I would gladly welcome
> any information on how this might be done. We would all benefit from that.
>
> Suzanne Kolb
> Associate Professor of Environmental Science
> Director, Brazilian Ecosystems Program
> sk...@antioch.edu
> Antioch University
>



-- 
clara b. jones
Blog: http://vertebratesocialbehavior.blogspot.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/cbjones1943

Reply via email to