This approach seems strange to me. The paper says that

" If citation behavior is rationale [sic], i.e. studies that successfully applied a treatment and detected greater biological effects are cited more frequently, then we predict that larger effect sizes increases study relative citation rates."

I see no reason to predict that effect size should have anything to do with citation rates. Citation rates should, and probably do, reflect many things that have nothing to do with effect sizes (usefulness of methodology and conceptual innovation are two that come to mind). Large effect sizes in studies of uninteresting problems aren't likely to be cited. Even small effect sizes in studies of important issues are likely to get cited.

Why the prediction that rational citation behavior should correlate with effect size?

Hal Caswell


On 10/3/12 6:26 PM, Chris Lortie wrote:
Dear Ecolog,

My colleagues and I are interested in whether citations, frequently used as a 
proxy for merit (i.e. most
highly cited work), relate to the biological significance of the study. As 
ecologists, we used a large set
of effect sizes from eeb to test this idea. If you are interested, it is OA, 
online early here:
http://www.springerlink.com/content/5375525681v282l2/

We found that there was no relationship between citations and effect sizes in 
ecology and we also
found that papers rejecting hypotheses had larger effect sizes.  This is really 
fascinating. We made
some fun interpretations of this but would love to have additional feedback on 
how we should move
forward either with citations in general or how to best use effect sizes.

One idea we have been kicking around is an effect size databank online. This 
would provide a real
opportunity for broad synthesis and be useful in contrasting efficacy of 
various treatments. Imagine a
simple online tool that you visit when you complete a study and you enter your 
effect size estimates
into.  Of course, full datasets etc would be fantastic but this would be a neat 
synthetic tool.

Any ideas appreciated.

cheers,
chris.


--
Hal Caswell
Senior Scientist
Biology Department MS-34
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Woods Hole MA 02543

+1-508-289-2751

Reply via email to