Hope this isn't out of order....years ago, a teacher had us review some bad, peer reviewed, published articles, to show us that what is published isn't necessarily gospel, we need to look at it with a critical eye. Basically, these were publications that had obvious shortcomings. the first were quite easy to identify the problem and then they got tougher. I'd like to use similar publications to teach a similar lesson to my students....any examples of publications come to mind? Lui
Lui Marinelli, PhD VP Contract Administration, SCFA Instructor, School of Environment and Geomatics (formally Renewable Resources) Selkirk College 301 Frank Beinder Way Castlegar, BC V1N 3J1 CANADA (250) 365-1269 ( tel:2503651269) [email protected]
