Read a photo-enriched version of this news release online: 
http://www.esa.org/esa/sagebrush-ecosystem-recovery-hobbled-by-loss-of-soil-complexity-at-development-sites/
 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Monday, 26 January 2015 
Contact: Liza Lester, 202-833-8773 ext. 211, [email protected]

 

In big sagebrush country, re-establishing the ecosystem's namesake shrub may 
jump-start the recovery process more successfully after oil and gas development 
than sowing grass-dominated reclamation seed mixes typically used to quickly 
re-vegetate bare soil on well pads, report two Colorado scientists in the 
January 2015 issue of Ecological Applications, released today. 

Big sagebrush is often conspicuously absent at restoration sites decades after 
disturbance. Historically, grasses have dominated the vegetation recovery 
following development, offering limited diversity and poor quality habitat for 
the 350 wildlife species harbored by what was once the most widespread 
ecosystem in the western United States.

"Successful restoration is more than establishing vegetation. To restore 
wildlife habitat so that it is self-renewing, it is critical that soils are 
returned to a healthy status as quickly as possible," said the study's lead 
scientist, Tamera Minnick, Professor of Environmental Science at Colorado Mesa 
University.

The authors sampled two undisturbed reference sites and eight reclaimed or 
abandoned natural gas well pads in Rio Blanco County, Colorado. They found that 
none of the oil and gas well pads included in the study had returned to a 
reference, or pre-drilling, condition, even those that had had 20 to 50 years 
to recover.

When a well pad is built, the topsoil and lower soil layers are removed and 
stored in piles in order to create a level work surface for drilling wells. 
Today's well pads, often consisting of dozens of wells per pad, may require 
removing soil from an area of 3-10 acres. When drilling is completed, current 
reclamation standards require oil and gas companies to replace the soil and 
reestablish plants. However, the stored soils are now thoroughly mixed or 
homogenized and have lost the patchy pattern of soil nutrients that existed 
before the well pad was built. 

"Sagebrush modifies its habitat to create patchy soils that make the habitat 
more resilient and even better for supporting sagebrush and all the other 
plants and animals that depend upon this important ecosystem," said Richard 
Alward, Principal Ecologist with Aridlands Natural Resource Consulting, and the 
study's coauthor. 

Other researchers have documented that sagebrush shrubs trap decaying organic 
matter, moisture, and nutrients in the soil beneath their canopies, creating 
"islands of fertility" in sagebrush habitat, which Minnick and Alward 
confirmed. The patchy pattern of nutrients favors the recovery of sagebrush, 
creating a positive feedback that reinforces the persistence of the ecosystem. 

The researchers found that some reclaimed well pads had total plant cover that 
was similar to the reference sites, a current requirement for reclamation, but 
those plants were primarily grasses or rabbitbrush. These species do not 
produce patches of high and low soil organic matter; instead the soils are much 
more uniform. This uniformity may ultimately make it more difficult to 
reestablish sagebrush - and to restore conditions favorable to diverse wildlife 
species.

 "There can be a conflict between short- and long-term restoration goals, for 
example, between immediate erosion control versus restoring wildlife habitat," 
said Minnick. "For the long-term stability of these ecosystems, it is critical 
to establish the natural feedbacks between plants and soil. And in this 
ecosystem, that means establishing big sagebrush. Wildlife habitat goals cannot 
be realized by merely establishing grasses."

Semi-arid and arid ecosystems are notoriously difficult to restore after heavy 
disturbance. Researchers from Idaho to Nevada, from Australia to Israel, have 
been identifying techniques that improve the chances of restoration success in 
these dry areas. These techniques work to promote soil patchiness, and positive 
feedbacks between plants and soils, in a process termed "autogenic" restoration.

The region where this study was conducted is considered "semi-arid" since it 
typically records less than 11 inches of rain per year. The researchers studied 
10 sites on public lands managed by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management in Rio 
Blanco County, western Colorado, approximately 55 miles north of Grand 
Junction.  This area has seen periodic, and sometimes very intense, oil and gas 
exploration over the last several decades. The soils of eight well pads that 
had been completed at various times since the 1960s were compared to soils at 
two nearby undisturbed sagebrush sites.

Successful restoration of oil and gas disturbances generates many benefits - to 
hunters and conservationists concerned with wildlife habitat, to oil and gas 
operators who desire continued access to these resources, to the public who 
reap benefits such as clean water and recreation opportunities, and to land 
managers who are responsible for  maintaining the land for multiple uses. 

Sagebrush ecosystems provide important habitat for many wildlife species in the 
western United States, including mule deer, pronghorn, elk, pygmy rabbits, 
golden eagles, and greater sage-grouse (the latter is a species being 
considered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for protection under the 
Endangered Species Act). Improved habitat restoration may decrease pressure for 
federal intervention to protect this iconic bird.



Plant-soil feedbacks and the partial recovery of soil spatial patterns on 
abandoned well pads in a sagebrush shrubland. (2015) Tamera J. Minnick and 
Richard D. Alward. Ecological Applications 25(1), 3-10. 
http://www.esajournals.org/doi/full/10.1890/13-1698.1 (Open Access).

###



********
Liza Lester
Communications Officer
Ecological Society of America
Washington, DC
(202) 833-8773 ext. 211

Ecotone: news and views on ecological science
Tweeting @esa_org

Reply via email to