Dear Kerry, Have you considered using the very low tech but quite effective 'canopy scope' method?
* Brown et al., 2000<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112715001693#b0020> * N. Brown, S. Jennings, P. Wheeler, J. Nabe-Nielsen * An improved method for the rapid assessment of forest understorey light environments * J. Appl. Ecol., 37 (2000), pp. 1044–1053 <https://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00573.x> Best wishes, Tonya ______________________ Dr Tonya Lander Department of Plant Sciences University of Oxford http://www.plants.ox.ac.uk/plants/staff/TonyaLander.aspx ________________________________ From: Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news [[email protected]] on behalf of Kerry Woods [[email protected]] Sent: 24 August 2015 18:09 To: [email protected] Subject: [ECOLOG-L] Comparison of canopy hemispherical photo systems Anyone with experience/insight on the relative merits of currently available systems for analysis of forest canopy using hemispherical photos (hemiview, winscanopy, etc.)? For use by undergrads, so ease of use is important. -- Kerry D. Woods Bennington College, Natural Sciences Dir. of Research, Huron Mt. Wildlife Found. www.hmwf.org<http://www.hmwf.org> faculty.bennington.edu/~kwoods<http://faculty.bennington.edu/~kwoods> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
