I cannot tell you how many peopel have brought up "The Martian." I guess I will need to see it! :)
I have a LOT of responses, I will try to post some kind of synopsis in a few days, after I am sure that everyone has spoken who wants to say something. Superficially, it sounds like sematics with reasonable rationale for the change. On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Sue Nichols <[email protected]> wrote: > Ah!! Alexandra, that’s just what I wondered about The Martian! > > This is such an interesting discussion, because how people describe what > they do is so informative (if you’re brave enough to pick and poke). > Because there’s a reason for it, right? > > I do wonder… have we lost anything by overshadowing “botany?” And how > does this change how scientists explain their work, and how important are > titles and labels? > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Sue Nichols > Assistant Director/Strategic communications > Center for Systems Integration and Sustainability > Michigan State University > (517) 432-0206 > > CSIS homepage <http://csis.msu.edu/> > CSIS on Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/MichStateCSIS> > @suegnic > > > > On Nov 18, 2015, at 7:30 PM, Alexandra Thorn <[email protected]> > wrote: > > It's an interesting question. > > I think of "botany" as being specifically about phylogeny and > characterizing how different plant species are different from one > another and why. Other plant sciences have other domains in my mind, > e.g. "plant physiology" is about the functional attributes of plants > that might translate among species (just as in animal physiology humans > and mice have basically the same organs), and "plant ecology" is about > the relationships among plant species and between plant species and > other organisms. > > My biology doctorate drew heavily on plant physiology and I feel fine > saying that my degree was in plant biology, plant ecology, or plant > physiology, but if somebody calls me a botanist I tend to think they're > attributing credentials to me that I really don't have. > > Alexandra > > P.S. I am bothered by how the term "botany" is used in the novel "The > Martian." I'm pretty sure that "horticulture" would be a better job > description, but I haven't looked up whether words are just used > differently by NASA and friends... > > On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:26:04 -0500 > Thomas Wentworth <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > Our Department at NC State University changed its name from Botany to > Plant Biology (not Plant Science) a number of years ago. We did so > primarily because of a perception that the public sees "botany" as an > antiquated term, not inclusive of the vibrant programs in our > department, which cover the plant realm from molecules to ecosystems. > We also believed that prospective student searching for "botany" > programs were more likely to use keywords like "plant" and "biology." > We avoided "Plant Science" because we thought that too inclusive of > ALL plant studies, given that at NC State (a Land Grant university) > we still have departments of Crop Science, Horticulture, Plant > Pathology, Forestry, etc. > > Tom Wentworth > > On 11/18/2015 1:00 PM, Christopher Graham wrote: > > Hi Malcolm, > > Interesting question. I studied in the plant biology department at > the University of Georgia, which until recently had been the botany > department. My understanding (and I think this was corroborated by > certain faculty members) was that the change reflected the gradual > shift from "traditional" botanists, who studied plants at a > macroscopic or organismal level and thus were facile with (at least > some members of) the regional flora; to academics who focused at > the cellular or molecular level to such a degree that many of them > do not particularly know or care about the real, wild plants > growing around them. I don't doubt that these plant scientists do > important things, but it's a shame to me that the former type, the > traditional botanist, has been largely displaced by them. > > chris > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Malcolm McCallum" <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 12:52:32 PM > Subject: plant science vs. botany > > > Over the past several years I have noticed a trend that > plant-focused vacancies will refer to the vacancy as plant science > and less frequently what used to be typically referred to as > zoology will be instead referred to as animal science. When I was > an undergraduate, agronomy, pomology, forestry, and course related > to agriculture were designated plant science. Agricutlure courses > like dairy science, feedlot management, swine management, animal > nutrition and the like were designated animal science. > > > The current widespread lack of distinction between zoology vs. > animal science, and botany vs. plant science creates a lot of > confusion, and doesn't really make any sense to me. > > > > Is there a reason that people have stopped using the term > zoology/botany and in its stead began using animal science/plant > science? It seems like an inappropriate muddying of the academic > waters to me. > > > A Plant Scientist and a Botanist are not the same thing, nor is an > animal scientist and a zoologist the same thing. Although some > people might cross these fields (a ruminant ecologist might cross > these areas for example). > > > I know most people probably couldn't care less about this, but I > feel it is a pretty important issue. If we are not consistent with > terminology, why should we expect students and others to take it > seriously? > > Please feel free to contact me off list because some members of the > ECOLOG discussion list get annoyed when it actually involves > discussion, so be it. > > > > > > > -- Malcolm L. McCallum, PHD, REP Link to online CV and portfolio : https://www.visualcv.com/malcolm-mc-callum?access=18A9RYkDGxO “Nothing is more priceless and worthy of preservation than the rich array of animal life with which our country has been blessed. It is a many-faceted treasure, of value to scholars, scientists, and nature lovers alike, and it forms a vital part of the heritage we all share as Americans.” -President Richard Nixon upon signing the Endangered Species Act of 1973 into law. "Peer pressure is designed to contain anyone with a sense of drive" - Allan Nation 1880's: "There's lots of good fish in the sea" W.S. Gilbert 1990's: Many fish stocks depleted due to overfishing, habitat loss, and pollution. 2000: Marine reserves, ecosystem restoration, and pollution reduction MAY help restore populations. 2022: Soylent Green is People! The Seven Blunders of the World (Mohandas Gandhi) Wealth w/o work Pleasure w/o conscience Knowledge w/o character Commerce w/o morality Science w/o humanity Worship w/o sacrifice Politics w/o principle Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
