Hi all,

The 25th anniversary of PICES is in San Diego, CA from Nov. 1 - 14. There are 
two relevant sessions entitled "Factors that make or break trophic linkages" 
with ecologists, oceanographers, and social scientists and "Understanding our 
Changing Oceans through Species Distributions and Habitat Models based on 
Remotely Sensed Data." You can submit an abstract here if interested, and the 
due date is July 1st - 
http://meetings.pices.int/meetings/annual/2016/pices/submissions<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__meetings.pices.int_meetings_annual_2016_pices_submissions&d=CwMFAg&c=imBPVzF25OnBgGmVOlcsiEgHoG1i6YHLR0Sj_gZ4adc&r=syifwYvH57YwYFfg_wZY1UiRmOLyWOv2c6tU4IcaVEI&m=M4wh4WcKlhZDOuK_n2HoJQLFhGWkuC6vp9a3JcIPYI8&s=hKOgX8dKlpzeinJDDdqNMpCtr1DL7jpE-RxAMxEpTJA&e=>

The session descriptions are below:

Mechanistic linkages from physics to phytoplankton to zooplankton to fish 
remain central to understanding climate forcing on marine ecosystems. Thus, it 
will be useful to understand how ecosystem linkages and species distribution 
are influenced by ocean features and how these linkages translate through the 
food web. Specifically, what information can be gained from moving beyond a 
single linkage (e.g. phytoplankton to zooplankton) towards a comparison across 
trophic levels in three very different North Pacific ecosystems. Examples of 
such factors may include but are not limited to broad scale anomalies (e.g. the 
blob, ENSO events, Kuroshio / Oyashio dynamics), temporal mismatches among 
physical processes, prey, and predators (match / mismatch hypothesis), and 
population fluctuations (e.g. lipid poor vs. lipid rich zooplankton). We have 
suggested (but are not limited to) three study areas, the California Current, 
the Kuroshio Current, and the Bering Sea to examine linkages from physics to 
phytoplankton, phytoplankton to zooplankton, zooplankton to fish, birds and 
mammals, and fish to birds and mammals. By looking at multiple ecosystems and 
trends and anomalies across multiple trophic linkages, we can better understand 
how climate variability and anthropogenic forcing may cascade through these 
marine ecosystems. We propose a topic session that will involve participation 
from multiple PICES committees and will focus on physical forcing and trophic 
linkages from physics to top predators. Specifically, we request presentations 
on topics that (a) examine how changes in physical oceanography lead to long 
term trends or anomalous responses in primary production, zooplankton, fish, 
and top predators, (b) examine how trophic relationships may respond to 
physical forcing and changes in species abundance and spatial distribution, and 
(c) test for threshold responses (non-linearity) across trophic levels to 
changes in physical oceanography and the population dynamics of other species 
(competitors, prey, and predators).

Determining marine animal distributions directly through at-sea observations or 
tracking is costly and logistically challenging. Moreover, even with limitless 
time and resources, information is limited because many species disperse over 
long distances including trans-hemispheric migrants. Species Distribution 
Models (SDMs) provide a tool to estimate present distributions and to project 
into the future (assuming species-environment relationships remain strong), but 
these models require substantial environmental data to accurately predict 
distribution and change. Increasingly, SDM approaches rely on remotely-sensed 
satellite data as indices of environmental conditions, particularly as proxies 
for primary and possibly secondary productivity. Satellite datasets are 
inexpensive to use, widely served, well-documented (i.e., scientifically 
defensible), and globally synoptic, allowing for easy spatio-temporal 
comparisons. However, satellite-borne sensors measure characteristics of the 
ocean at the surface while marine organisms respond to spatial and temporal 
features of the ocean at depth, which may require more complex approaches. In 
this session, we will investigate the opportunities and challenges of using 
satellite-based habitat models and ways we can advance SDMs for a better 
understanding our changing oceans and for improving management. In particular, 
we solicit papers exploring the benefits and tradeoffs of using satellite-borne 
data to detect mechanisms of distributional and range shifts. This session will 
provide the PICES community and the FUTURE program with a better sense of the 
quality of fisheries, seabird, and marine mammal SDM under development in 
relation to climate change in the North Pacific.

Sincerely,
Elliott Hazen, PhD

Reply via email to