Some times I think that all the clothes I will need for the rest of my life (I'm 50 years old), I already own. However, it is great fun to shop in second-hand stores. The clothes are worth more because they have history, but cost less. The variety is greater than in the clothing stores and shopping is more like a treasure hunt. The onus or stigma of having been created in a sweatshop is one generation removed, and I am making use of another person's waste.
Interesting industries are sprouting that recycle wood products: barnwood for paneling, huge beams, and other things. These products may cost more than freshly milled wood, and here the fact that they have history actually adds to the sticker price. Many such products are offered for sale with a written account of their former use. >>> jeff owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/6/2001 11:04:31 AM >>> More comments taken from the book "Organic Living". The chapter on wood suggests buying from FSC certified sources and then goes into how wood is a precious resource. The idea that someone could grow their own wood is almost never mentioned. Why not? Are we so disconnected from trees or urbanized that we no longer consider trees part of the garden? The chapter "Design for Life" suggests planning a home with a somewhat holistic approach. Things like where one works and local weather should be taken into consideration. Good ideas. For clothing they suggest wool, hemp, and cotton products. Also mentioned were recycled products and silk. A more frugal DIY mentality might choose thrift stores and sewing. The far edge might raise sheep, spin and use dog/cat hair for hats and socks. Next, a whole chapter is devoted to raising pets organically. My feelings are mixed on this. It gets into the purpose of pets, animal rights, natural diets, and what techniques help diversity. What do you think? Each culture views this differently. Does this mean our bias is mostly due to cultural conditioning? Does animal rights differ from human rights? jeff
