Oliver Munz @ SNR wrote: > ... then i have to rewrite the void hal_plf_eth_init(void). I can make a > new platform-variant for this, but may be there is a better solution > like: make the hal_plf_eth_init PHY-dependent or make it configurable > defined as external or something like this... > > The problem is, that every PHY has other initalisation requirements. And > furthermore its a question of the concrete hardware what the CPU has to > do to bring it to work. So the hal_plf_eth_init depens on the PHY, the > ethernet and microcontroller and the concret circuit... > > What is the best way to use a special hal_plf_eth_init()?
What's the platform/target? -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------
