John Dallaway wrote:
Hi Simon and all
Simon Kallweit wrote:
John Dallaway schrieb:
Having reviewed the lwIP ChangeLog, I think it makes sense to simply
replace the older lwIP port in the eCos CVS trunk (tagging the
repository before the commit). There are known issues with lwIP PPP
which need to be addressed upstream. In the meantime, eCos users wishing
to work with lwIP PPP should be better off hacking on the lwIP 1.3.1
stack where necessary rather than using the older port.
I think this is the way to go. There is already some hacking on PPP in
my port, which could lead to some confusion, as it is not identical to
the lwIP codebase. Also it does only work in a polled environment like
mine, so it might not be much use of the broad community. I don't know
how we should proceed with this?
Perhaps it would be preferable to publish your PPP-related changes as a
patch for the time being and keep the CVS sources as close to the master
lwIP code as possible.
That sounds like a good idea. I'll look into it.
I'll do the merge with the newest lwip sources tomorrow and release the
package.
Simon
