Hi Uwe John Dallaway wrote:
> Uwe Kindler wrote: > >> if I move the all uSTL headers except of ustl.h into an ustl >> subdirectory, then I need to touch almost all include directives in the >> ustl header and source files. I.e. in unew.c I would replace #include >> "unew.h" by #include "ustl/unew.h". Did I understand this right? > > I've just taken a quick look at the sources. It is indeed unfortunate > that the #includes in the various header files do not specify the ustl/ > subdirectory like ustl.h does in the upstream sources. The quick fix > here is to rename config.h to something like ustlcfg.h as you suggest. > But I'm concerned that other conflicts may arise in the future. > > Why does the original author make a distinction between include paths in > ustl.h and in the other ustl header files? To answer my own question, I now note that the original code uses a ustl/ symlink. I think the correct long-term approach for eCos is to move the header files (other than ustl.h) into include/ustl/ and to modify the source code accordingly. This will involve changes to many files but the changes are trivial and can be applied using a simple substitution so this should not impact future code imports much. If you agree with this approach, I will make the changes. John Dallaway
