Hi Simon Simon Kallweit wrote:
> John Dallaway wrote: > >> Excellent. I would like to push through with final review and get your >> lwIP port checked in to CVS, replacing the existing lwIP 1.1.1 port. Is >> lwip-20091027.tar.gz still current or do you have further changes? >> Should I be comparing your package with the upstream lwIP 1.3.1 sources >> or is it now closer to lwIP 1.3.2 RC1? > > Sorry for the late answer, I have been on holidays. I think we should > wait a few days for the lwIP 1.3.2 release. I'll merge the changes and > do a few tests so we have a good initial version for a CVS checkin. It > seems that some work has been done on the PPP code as well. I'll see how > it fits with my current port. I've just noticed a new tarball lwip-20091224.tar.gz on your site. Were you intending to do any further work on this in the immediate future or shall we work towards an initial check-in of your port based on this tarball? John Dallaway eCos maintainer
