Hi Sergei Sergei Gavrikov wrote:
> Well, what can I say. I would avoid addition 'flash_arm_lpc2xxx' package > by default for mentioned targets in ecos.db, but, this is my view only. > Perhaps, I missed something and if Andrew is on the list, he can correct > me on the "v1/v2 mix" issue. Thank you for looking into this. It seems that a flash v2 version of the package with dummy block-locking functions would be desirable. Maybe someone in the eCos community will be interested in developing support for LPC2xxx internal flash along these lines. For avoidance of doubt, I will not add the existing package to any LPC2xxx target definitions. John Dallaway eCos maintainer http://www.dallaway.org.uk/john
