On Mon, 16 Jan 2012, Sergei Gavrikov wrote: > I hope I have convinced you and Stano that I did not suggest to "close" > eCos sources by __ecos__ checks. More that to propagate that built-in > definition is only a few lines for GCC patch and if that is issue I am > ready to withdraw my "I like their built-in" :-)
Nobody (me too) said (thought) about: http://www.ecoscentric.com/trademark_usage.shtml AIANL. So, I actually withdraw my "wish" as [eCos] is registered trademark and anyone would use our patches and abuse the word. Sergei
