On 05/04/12 21:25, Jonathan Larmour wrote: > On 05/04/12 20:13, John Dallaway wrote: >> Given that the design intention is to use platform packages to define >> targets, I don't understand why you would regard using a "set_value" >> command (located outside the HAL package hierarchy) as being closer to >> how things are supposed to be. > > Because the setting of options is associated with the target entry, which > comes from the platform HAL package.
To be clear, I mean which _will_ come from the platform HAL package. One thing the design did not include was extra little HAL packages whose only raison d'être is to set a config option. Jifl --["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine
