> Even _without_ all the license issues that would be a good thing. > However, when we first implemented EML, the EtherCAT people were still > working on conformance testing.
Is that now finished? Is it time for version 0.2 of the code with extra conformance testing? > Also note that the extra clause is an agreement between Beckhoff and > the licensee (and FMTC has nothing to do with that agreement), that > "protects" the licensee from patent claims covering the EtherCAT > technology. Maybe GPLv3 is the solution. That includes patent protection as far as i understand. Andrew -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
