On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 02:46:32PM -0400, Scott Moore wrote: > Right now, I am just hacking up the lpc2xxx series to get our stuff > running without regard for lpc21xx and lpc22xx backwards compatibility. > > Hey, blame Phillips for creating an incompatibility in their own > series.
Is this the only incompatibility? AFAIK the lpc23xx series uses a ARM9 core and has more (different) on-chip peripherals and memory. I have currently no clue about that, but I think that supporting the lpc23xx in a different tree would make sense iff there more incompatibilities than just the interrupt stuff. But renaming the lpc2xxx in lpc21xx_lpc22xx is something I wouldn't do. I would just leave it as it is, adding a new CPU without disturbing any old once. -- %SYSTEM-F-ANARCHISM, The operating system has been overthrown -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
