Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 05:38:02AM -0500, Chris Zimman wrote: > >> Frank, >> >> I think you raise a valid point here. Perhaps it would be time to consider >> creating a more up to date release. >> Rather frequently on the list, someone will say something to the effect of >> 'I've downloaded/am using eCos 2.0 ...blah blah...it seems very out of >> date...' The traditional response has been 'Go pull the latest from CVS'. >> >> Thoughts anyone? >> > > It has been for a long time the aim to make a release once the > copyright transfer to FSF is completed. This has take much much longer > than we ever thought it would take. We are nearly there, there is just > one copyright assignment left, which is taking a while to sort out. > > Once this is completed we will start the work needed for a > release. This is not something we can do overnight. It involves a lot > of work. Nearly ever file needs to be touched in order to change the > copyright notices. We probably need new tool chains, want to merge in > the v2 flash branch, maybe pick up some patches which got dropped > along the way etc. We need to do a lot of testing.... > > Andrew > And yet there isn't any note of this event. I am apologize for changing the subject, but I don't recall of any announcement on mailing list and surely there isn't any news at ecos.sourceware.org. I got an official (snail mail) letter from eCosCentric about my assignment being transfered to FSF and that's all.
Best regards Ilija -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
