> You could contribute it back if you wanted to, but you would have to > rebase the patch to the open anoncvs tree, not eCosCentric's tree. But > in some respects it does not necessarily help you. You want the > patches in the next tree you get from eCosCentric as part of your > support contract and there is no guarantee eCosCentric will pull the > changes from the open anoncvs tree into there eCosPro tree. So you end > up contributing it to both to get the most advantage out of it.
That wasn't really the point I was trying to make. I have chosen not to put it into anon CVS at the moment because eCosCentric may want to offer it as part of eCosPro. I think, at some point, they will release an updated tree for anon CVS. If I were to release it, I would probably just fork the tree anyhow. --Chris -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
