Hi Simon Simon Kallweit wrote:
>> I assume that your port would sit under the standard eCos Flash I/O >> layer (CYGPKG_IO_FLASH). As with all imported packages, it would also be >> important to: > > UFFS is not yet great for NOR flash, as every file/directory uses at > least a complete block. That's why I was asking for the NAND package. > The port could support both NOR and NAND flash, but until UFFS is > upgraded to handle NOR better, it's quite useless in production. Yes, I see now. UFFS would be implemented as an eCos file system exposed via CYGPKG_IO_FILEIO, talking to a separate NAND flash layer via CYGPKG_IO_FLASH. John Dallaway -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
