Mandeep Sandhu wrote:
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Simon Kallweit<[email protected]> wrote:
Mandeep Sandhu wrote:
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Simon Kallweit<[email protected]>
wrote:
Mandeep Sandhu wrote:
There is a semaphore created in cyg_lwip_sequential_init() which will
block
until all initialization (including ethernet devices) in the tcpip thread
is
done. Therefore it's priority does not matter. cyg_lwip_sequential_init()
should not return before initialization is completed.

I just reviewed the code and found that the semaphore is initialized with
1,
which is clearly a bug, it should be initialized with 0 so that the
following call to cyg_semaphore_wait() is actually blocking the thread
until
initialization is done.

My mistake, sorry! Hope it works as intended now. New release:

http://download.westlicht.ch/lwip-20090903.tar.gz
Thanks Simon. I totally missed the sem init part...i guess since the sem
is
init to 1...the thread never actually waits...and thats why I was seeing
the
problem.
Exactly. I glanced over this code more than once and it didn't occur to me.
Thanks a lot for testing! This is really helpful.

No problem. I'm just glad I'm able to help.

I downloaded your new rel. It still had that sem init'ed to 1! That should be
0 right? If thats the only change I'll do it in my local copy and test it.

Oh my, git tricked me :) Yeah, this should be 0. Please see if that works. It did for me, before git tricked me, hehe

Simon

--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss

Reply via email to