Sergei Gavrikov <sergei.gavri...@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 05:05:20PM +0400, Sergei Organov wrote: >> Alex Schuilenburg <al...@ecoscentric.com> writes: >> >> [...] >> >> > Both bazaar and mercurial were a lot easier to learn and work with >> > than git. git's Windows support is also limited and is mostly >> > restricted to the 100's of cmd apps which make up git under cygwin. >> >> Once again, I'm not a Windows user, but is this really true nowadays? >> >> E.g., what about this one: >> >> <http://code.google.com/p/tortoisegit/> >> >> Isn't it good enough for Windows users? > > There are many tortoises there: Tortoise{SVN,Hg,Bzr,Git,...}
Yeah, that was my argument: all of them probably have roughly the same functionality. Isn't it what Windows users actually use? If they do, then git should be not worse than others in this area. -- Sergei. -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
