I'm concerned that there aren't enough eCos maintainers to go around. There are *trivial* patches that take much too long to get any sort of attention. This is bad for eCos.
What's an acceptable turnaround for a trivial patch? I'd say a week is longish, two weeks is a patch dropped on the floor effectively. I'm not asking that the current maintainers should spend more time on eCos, but I am asking that more maintainers are recruited. I haven't made any statistics, nor do I track what patches should have been committed, but here is a trival patch: http://sourceware.org/ml/ecos-patches/2009-09/msg00016.html What's the best way forward here? -- Øyvind Harboe Embedded software and hardware consulting services http://www.zylin.com -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
