On Thu, 9 Dec 2010, Sergei Gavrikov wrote: > [Fork thread] > > FYI: SSL for silly H/W > > Michael Bergandi wrote: > > Sergei, > > > > Sergei Gavrikov wrote: > > > My 2 cents: > > > > > > I would look at PolarSSL > > > 1) http://polarssl.org/features > > > 2) http://polarssl.org/licensing > > > > > > IMO, point #2 is valuable thing to port PolarSSL to eCos. > > > > Looks Ok, but I see no mention of an interface to encryption > > hardware accelerators. That is a big sticking point for us. > > Michael, I get it. Excuse this fork, maybe it's interesting to know. > > As an getting the 'libpolarssl.a' for eCos took only 10 minutes > (project follows great coding style) and library's size was <160K, I > will stick on it and I hope I will try to test it this weekend. > However, this was my first look. > > At least I got 3 simple SSL (PolarSSL) execs for eCos (2 clients and 1 > server) for testing. It was just used eCos 'net' template to build > the library and tests. I hope they will work. If anyone is interested > I have small patch and draft makefile to build PolarSSL for eCos.
Hi, Well, as I promised to test, short report is here. PolarSSL 'ssl_server' quite works under eCos (tested on Linux synthetic target). The encrypted connections with the server were established using Mozilla Firefox 3.6, 4.0 beta; Google Chrome 8.0 beta; w3m/0.5.2. I'm sorry, I have not IEs. I would mention also that you can test PolarSSL executables are built for your hosts (Lunux or Windows). On my look port PolarSSL to eCos would be straightforward, but, now I have some doubts about it's license (all sources point on GPL only). Sergei -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
