What about setting a breakpoint in hal_switch_state_vsr? Is it the SWI instruction that triggers the exception or is it the execution of the hal_switch_state_vsr routine?
Christophe > -----Original Message----- > From: ecos-discuss-ow...@ecos.sourceware.org [mailto:ecos-discuss- > ow...@ecos.sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Philipp Meier > Sent: 24. august 2011 16:58 > To: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org > Subject: Re: RE: [ECOS] ecos-3.0 current stm32 bug? > > Hello Christophe, > > Yes - both are ROM startup type. The bootloader without offset (i.e. > offset 0x0), the application with offset 0x40000. > > In the bootloader elf file hal_vsr_table is 20000000 and the same is > true for the application. > > GDB debug output when debugging the startup of the application: > > Bad case (Linux built bootloader): > ---------------------------------- > (gdb) print /fx hal_vsr_table > $1 = {0x441c4c08, 0x61232301, 0x8040043, 0x8040043, 0x8040043, > 0x8040043, 0x8040043, 0x8040043, 0x8040043, 0x8040043, > 0x8040043, 0x8040025, 0x8040043, 0x8040043, 0x8040089, 0x8040075 > <repeats 61 times>} > (gdb) print /fx &hal_vsr_table > $2 = 0x20000000 > > Good case (Cygwin built bootloader): > ---------------------------------- > (gdb) print /fx hal_vsr_table > $1 = {0x4024f8df, 0xf04f4d09, 0x8040043, 0x8040043, 0x8040043, > 0x8040043, 0x8040043, 0x8040043, 0x8040043, 0x8040043, > 0x8040043, 0x8040025, 0x8040043, 0x8040043, 0x8040089, 0x8040075 > <repeats 61 times>} > (gdb) print /fx &hal_vsr_table > $2 = 0x20000000 > > Cheers > Philipp > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > > Datum: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 07:22:53 -0700 > > Von: "Christophe Coutand" <ccout...@stmi.com> > > An: "Philipp Meier" <pme.nera...@gmx.ch>, "ecos discuss" <ecos- > disc...@ecos.sourceware.org> > > Betreff: RE: [ECOS] ecos-3.0 current stm32 bug? > > > Both the bootloader and the application are ROM startup type? > > > > What about the address of the hal_vsr_table in the bootloader and > > application? > > > > Christophe > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: ecos-discuss-ow...@ecos.sourceware.org [mailto:ecos-discuss- > > > ow...@ecos.sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Philipp Meier > > > Sent: 24. august 2011 16:11 > > > To: ecos discuss > > > Subject: Re: [ECOS] ecos-3.0 current stm32 bug? > > > > > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > > > > Datum: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 14:35:15 +0300 (EEST) > > > > Von: Sergei Gavrikov <sergei.gavri...@gmail.com> > > > > An: Philipp Meier <pme.nera...@gmx.ch> > > > > CC: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org > > > > Betreff: Re: [ECOS] ecos-3.0 current stm32 bug? > > > > > > > On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Philipp Meier wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi all > > > > > > > > > > I have a firmware split into two parts: > > > > > 1. a "bootloader" > > > > > 2. a "application" > > > > > > > > > > I now need to move from Windows (cygwin) development > environment to > > > > > Linux development environment and at the same time use the > current > > > > > ecos version (i.e. what I get when I clone the ecos mercurial > > > > > repository) instead of the "original" (back in 2009) ecos-3.0 > > > version. > > > > > > > > > > The situation is now as follows: > > > > > 1. I download (to my stm32 device) the Linux/ecos-current > built > > > > > "bootloader" > > > > > 2. I download (to my stm32 device) the Linux/ecos-current > built > > > > > "application" > > > > > 3. I start the application and in line 187 of file > > > > > 'hal/cortexm/arch/current/src/hal_msic.c' instead of branching > to > > > > > 'hal_switch_state_vsr' it branches to > 'hal_default_exception_vsr' > > > > > function! > > > > > > > > > > To analyze the problem I then: > > > > > 4. Downloaded (to my stm32 device) the cyginw/ecos-3.0 built > > > > > "bootloader" > > > > > 5. Still having the Linux/ecos-current built "application" > > > > > 6. And in line 187 (of the above mentioned file) it branches > (as > > > it > > > > > should) to 'hal_switch_state_vsr' and the application is > starting > > > up > > > > > and running fine! > > > > > > > > > > Who can give me a hint about > > > > > * what has been changed in ecos-current cortexm stm32 that > could > > > > > cause this problem > > > > > > > > Hi Philipp, > > > > > > > > I think you can use Mercurial for that > > > > > > > > % hg tags | grep v3 > > > > ecos-v3_0-branchpoint 2821:b5a12bb6a634 > > > > > > > > % hg log -r ecos-v3_0-branchpoint:tip packages/hal/cortexm/arch | > > > less > > > > -FRSX > > > > > > > > or (may be) > > > > > > > > % hg log --patch -r ecos-v3_0-branchpoint:tip \ > > > > packages/hal/cortexm/arch/current/src/hal_misc.c | less - > FRSX > > > > > > > > etc. > > > > > > > > > * or what else I could analyze to find out why ecos-current > (built > > > on > > > > > Linux, arm-eabi-gcc (eCosCentric GNU tools 4.3.2-sw); under > cygwin > > > I > > > > > also used the arm-eabi-gcc version 4.3.2 pre-built by > eCosCentric) > > > > > > > > Also you would check the Linux build for ecos-3.0 codebase > > > > > > > > # get old (working) code > > > > % hg update ecos-v3_0-branchpoint > > > > > > > > Rebuild your loader and application under Linux and try it (use > fresh > > > > directories for builds). After all do not forget up-to-date eCos > HG > > > > repository (hg update default). > > > > > > > > Feel free to submit a bug report (if you'll find something) via > eCos > > > > Bugzilla System http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/ > > > > > > > > > > > > Sergei > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > Philipp > > > > > > Hello Sergei and others > > > > > > Thanks a lot for your tips about how to find out the differences > > > between the versions. > > > > > > I now went a step back and built (under Linux) my "bootloader" and > my > > > "application" under Linux using the same ecos sources and > configuration > > > files as when I built them under Windows/cygwin. > > > > > > Therefore - I wanted to see if the problem comes from building > under > > > Linux, or from changes in the ecos stm32 parts (or any other ecos > > > parts). > > > > > > But - I have the same problem as described above; i.e. the problem > must > > > be somehow in my Linux toolchain? > > > > > > Therefore my question now is: > > > Can anybody give me some background information about how the > "__asm__ > > > volatile( "swi" )" statement in line 188 of > > > packages/hal/cortexm/arch/v3_0/src/hal_misc.c (or "swi 0" line 187 > in > > > packages/hal/cortexm/arch/current/src/hal_misc.c when using ecos- > > > current) is interpreted on stm32? What could be the reason that it > does > > > not jumps to "hal_switch_state_vsr" but instead jumps to > > > "hal_default_exception_vsr"? > > > > > > The lines where the different behaviour is look like this: > > > hal_vsr_table[CYGNUM_HAL_VECTOR_SERVICE] = > > > (CYG_ADDRESS)hal_switch_state_vsr; > > > > > > __asm__ volatile( "swi" ); > > > > > > ... > > > > > > In the good case these leads to a jump/branch to > hal_switch_state_vsr > > > and in the bad case it jumps/branches to hal_default_exception_vsr > and > > > therefore my application does not starts up. > > > > > > Thanks for any help. > > > > > > Philipp > > > -- > > > P.S.: Sorry Sergei - I did not mean to reply directly to you but > like > > > this to the mailing list. > > > -- > > > NEU: FreePhone - 0ct/min Handyspartarif mit Geld-zurück-Garantie! > > > > > > Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone > > > > > > -- > > > Before posting, please read the FAQ: > > > http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos > > > and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos- > discuss > > > > -- > NEU: FreePhone - 0ct/min Handyspartarif mit Geld-zurück-Garantie! > > Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone > > -- > Before posting, please read the FAQ: > http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos > and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss