On Thu, 1 Mar 2012, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2012-03-01, Sergei Gavrikov wrote: > > >>> IMHO, it is neat solution. Thanks for usage example. BTW, the KAME's > >>> successors had declared ip6_init2() as you suggest: > >>> > >>> http://ftp.fr.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/src/sys/netinet6/ip6_input.c > >>> > >>> Please, submit the patch. > >> > >> OK, will do. I noticed after that last post that ip6_init is renamed > >> to cyg_ip6_init by one of the include files. > > > > Yes, I'm seeing that was entered in a merge/fix patch from Kelvin Lawson > > in 2011. But there is also > > > > include/sys/param.h:224:#define ip6_init cyg_ip6_init > > > >> I assume I should do the same thing for ip6_init2 if it's going to be > >> global? > > > > I have doubt. May be to change a scope of the function in ip6_input.c > > will be enough for the case? As for me I would not propagate the > > definition {cyg_,}ip6_init2 in the headers. Though, may be I wrong > > here. I would stop on your first proposal: > > > > -static void ... > > +void ... > > I've already submitted a patch with the #define added, but if the > consensus is to leave the symbol un-mangled, then I can submit a new > patch. Or maybe you're right. In any case we will get a way to manage ip6 init.
Thank you for contribution. Sergei -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
