On Dec 21, 2007 5:32 PM, Jonathan Larmour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Øyvind Harboe wrote: > > I duplicated memjoin.inl and modified it for my own needs. Attached are > > some backported, untested, changes in case someone feels the urge > > to test & report on them. > > You are using a system with more than 255 memory pools?
No. Two. > > If it's just a case of "what if", then I can just add an assert in instead. The code is broken for two pools. > > The rest of the patch is ok (although the changelog does not reflect the > other changes) and I'll commit it if you can confirm there really is a > demand for >255 pools! byte arithmetic is *slower* than cpu word length. Why use anything but the natural width arithmetic? > > Jifl > -- > eCosCentric Limited http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos experts > Barnwell House, Barnwell Drive, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 1223 245571 > Registered in England and Wales: Reg No 4422071. > ------["Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere"]------ Opinions==mine > -- Øyvind Harboe http://www.zylin.com - eCos ARM & FPGA developer kit
