Hi Bart Bart Veer wrote:
> There is some confusion in the rm7000/ocelot HAL. The original CDL > always used -mips2 for CFLAGS, but either -mips32 or -mips2 for > LDFLAGS depending on endianness. I have assumed that the -mips32 was a > typo and have switched to -mips2 throughout, but I don't know the > details of this platform. The RM7000 is a MIPS IV processor and does not support the entire MIPS32 instruction set. Compilation with -mips2 for this target was deliberate. I expect the -mips32 linker switch is indeed erroneous. John Dallaway
