A few weeks ago, I posted a query about booleans on the ecos-discuss list (http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss/2010-04/msg00035.html). There were no comments either way, so here's a patch. It should mean that all booleans end up using GCC's _Bool type, instead of a mix of _Bool and int. It showed up a couple of places where a function prototype didn't match the implementation, and this patch fixes them.
Do others think that there was a problem with boolean definitions, and is this an appropriate fix? Alan Bowman
bool_patch_hg
Description: Binary data
