Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001142
--- Comment #26 from John Dallaway <[email protected]> 2011-02-16 10:11:25 GMT --- (In reply to comment #25) > In comment 9 Sergei wrote: > > If we do not need those defs at all, I would be happy with (not tested) > > In comment 10 John wrote: > > It does seem preferable to eliminate the SECTION_START() and SECTION_END() > > macros if possible. I assume these macros are not used elsewhere. > > In comment 23 Ilija wrote: > > Now I agree with you to omit START/END macros. > > Consensus? If it is, Ilija, could you, please, submit a final patch for > cortexm.ld after testing? If I've understood correctly, you (Ilija and Sergei) are now in agreement that peripheral memory section names will need not require de-stringification. I agree with this. In fact, I expect peripheral memory sections will typically have fixed names. Packages like lwIP will be configured to use the section name provided by the HAL package, not vice-versa. So lets eliminate the SECTION_START() and SECTION_END() macros and add a single USER_SECTION() macro to cortexm.ld. We can check this in ahead of the LPC17xx contribution and it will be one less thing to hold in our minds. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
