Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ecryptfs-utils
Bug in ecryptfs-setup-private calls bash to do a bitwise-and operation.
Rather, we could use awk here... Something like:
cat /sys/fs/ecryptfs/version | awk '{printf "%d", and($1 , 0x100)}'
:-Dustin
** Affects: ecryptfs
Importance: High
Assignee: Dustin Kirkland (kirkland)
Status: In Progress
** Affects: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu)
Importance: High
Assignee: Dustin Kirkland (kirkland)
Status: In Progress
** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dustin Kirkland (kirkland)
Status: New => In Progress
Target: None => jaunty-alpha-5
** Also affects: ecryptfs
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ecryptfs
Importance: Undecided => High
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dustin Kirkland (kirkland)
Status: New => In Progress
--
jaunty alpha4: server install does not use filename encryption
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326184
You received this bug notification because you are a member of eCryptfs,
which is subscribed to ecryptfs-utils in ubuntu.
Status in eCryptfs - Enterprise Cryptographic Filesystem: In Progress
Status in “ecryptfs-utils” source package in Ubuntu: In Progress
Bug description:
Binary package hint: ecryptfs-utils
Bug in ecryptfs-setup-private calls bash to do a bitwise-and operation.
Rather, we could use awk here... Something like:
cat /sys/fs/ecryptfs/version | awk '{printf "%d", and($1 , 0x100)}'
:-Dustin
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ecryptfs
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ecryptfs
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp