Hi, thanks so much for the bug report. I've been thinking about this quite a bit lately. I'm going to have to mark this "won't fix" for now.
The prevailing opinion from security professionals is that fingerprints are perhaps a good replacement for usernames. However, they're really not a good replacement for passwords. Consider your laptop... How many fingerprints of yours are there on your laptop right now? As such, it's about as secret as your username. You don't leave your password on your spacebar, or on your beer bottle :-) This wikipedia entry (although it's about Microsoft Fingerprint Readers) is pretty accurate: * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Fingerprint_Reader So, I'm sorry, but I don't think we'll be fixing this for now. :-Dustin ** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- add support for fingerprint readers in pam_ecryptfs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255799 You received this bug notification because you are a member of eCryptfs, which is subscribed to ecryptfs-utils in ubuntu. Status in “ecryptfs-utils” source package in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Bug description: Binary package hint: ecryptfs-utils User request, it seems a good wishlist item to me... "It does not seem currently possible to use this solution in combination with a fingerprint reader, since the pam module has to intercept the login password. Is this going to be a possibility in the future?" -- woutersj :-Dustin _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ecryptfs Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ecryptfs More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
