Dustin - other then a couple of system wide commits (vfs creds and some
current user macros), I see no substantive difference between Jaunty
fs/ecryptfs and the version in Linus tree as of 2.6.29-rc8
a1e4ee22863d41a6fbb24310d7951836cb6dafe7.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
please sync jaunty ecryptfs kernel module with linus' git tree
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/331082
You received this bug notification because you are a member of eCryptfs,
which is subscribed to ecryptfs-utils in ubuntu.
Status in “ecryptfs-utils” source package in Ubuntu: Triaged
Status in “linux” source package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
Bug description:
Tim-
Please sync Jaunty's ecryptfs kernel module with Linus' upstream git tree.
There are some errors in dmesg that Tyler believes are fixed with the upstream
code. The messages on my system look like this:
[ 46.330479] ecryptfs_parse_tag_70_packet: max_packet_size is [56]; real
packet size is [51]
[ 46.330486] ecryptfs_decode_and_decrypt_filename: Could not parse tag 70
packet from filename; copying through filename as-is
I'm attaching a patch from Tyler.
This is for spot-check review only! I think it will be in our best interest
for you to do the sync via git merging mechanisms.
Thanks,
:-Dustin
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ecryptfs
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ecryptfs
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
