on 3/24/00 8:13 AM, Derek Scherger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyway, let me try a different approach here. Who else is using ECS
> instead of or in addition to JSP and what are your thoughts on doing
> this? Our impressions are that the code is *much* more readable and the
> design ends up much cleaner using ECS. The only problem we have selling
> ECS internally at this point is that retrieving a similar JSP page is 2x
> to 10x faster than retrieving the same page generated with ECS. On the
> other hand, the HTML generated by ECS is about half the size of the
> corresponding JSP HTML although I'm sure this can be fixed somewhat by
> uglifying the JSP page even further.
The issue with speed is obviously an issue with JVM speed. ECS does have an
overhead, but it isn't so much that it outweighs its advantages.
I personally wouldn't use ECS as a replacement for JSP. I also wouldn't use
JSP. ;-) So, what would I use today? I would use a combination of Turbine
and WebMacro or Freemarker or I would use Cocoon.
-jon
--
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]