Adam Thompson <[email protected]> writes: > "SpiderMonkey now provides a fully C++ interface, > so embedders relying on embeddability in C projects will have to convert to > C++, or implement their own adapter code."
Hi, Thank you ever so much for doing the research. Years ago, we batted around the idea of rewriting edbrowse in C++. Those string objects would sure be nice, and after all, edbrowse is very string-intensive. We also use lists in some places, and we could use STL's list container instead. But it never happened. C++ is a complicated beast. The people who work on edbrowse are more comfortable with C. I used to be decent with C++, but I've managed to forget most of what I knew. So I'm not chomping at the bit to do this. I wonder how difficult the adapter code will be? I assume it'll just be tedious. Happy Holidays, -- Chris _______________________________________________ Edbrowse-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.the-brannons.com/mailman/listinfo/edbrowse-dev
