On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 02:14:32PM +0000, Karl Dahlke wrote: > > Refresh: 30;url=http://the-brannons.com/ > > Sure, but, this is I think exactly the same header I use for code 302. > I guess you're saying sometimes we get this header with code 200, > and are suppose to jump on that.
My understanding is that with codes 301, 302 and 303 the url is provided in the Location header rather than this one. As Chris says, this is only a pseudo-standard header created by netscape which has been supported by all the big browsers and unfortunately some sites rely on it. > Well I'm not looking for that, I'm watching the codes first, > but I might be able to check for the header even on code 200. > Not sure if I should infer in this case code 301, 302 or 303. As I said this should behave exactly the same as the meta refresh mechanism does apparently. As for whether the html or http refresh header should be used if both are present, I'd probably go with the html and display a warning if they differ. Cheers, Adam.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Edbrowse-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.the-brannons.com/mailman/listinfo/edbrowse-dev
