On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 05:17:43PM -0500, Karl Dahlke wrote: > I forgot about some of the handler functions. > Let me have a look and evaluate, and then I'll > bat it back into your court.
Thanks, sounds good. Also, from a design perspective, it'd be nicer if the alert, prompt etc functions were done as part of the protocol, letting edbrowse handle user interaction I think. At the moment it's going to make future enhancements a bit awkward with the server occasionally needing user input, plus I don't see why this can't be done via ipc messages. Any thoughts? Cheers, Adam.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Edbrowse-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.the-brannons.com/mailman/listinfo/edbrowse-dev
