> I think we should continue to move forward with the design
Absolutely, and I am.
I'm working on it as we speak.
And I don't think we'll need to change libraries or go back to a handwritten
parser either.
I'm pretty comfortable hitching my wagon to tidy5.
This is the first bug in many tests, and either they'll fix it,
or I'll preprocess the text to get around it:
replace </ in a string with <" + "/
That's kinda gross, and maybe a last resort,
but we're not going to retreat.
This new design is the direction we need to travel, for so many reasons.
Karl Dahlke
_______________________________________________
Edbrowse-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.the-brannons.com/mailman/listinfo/edbrowse-dev
