Karl Dahlke <[email protected]> writes: > Chris maybe you want to maintain a list of items to close before new version.
Yes, great idea. I don't think we're ready yet. This is a nice list; my comments are below. > Will they be releasing an official version that we are comfortable with? > If not, how can we build and bundle our software with version 5.1.15 This is a big sticking point for a new edbrowse release. I don't know what Geoff's release plans are, but that's a discussion we can have sometime soonish, I suppose. We're still hammering out tidy issues. If we end up bundling our own Tidy 5, my job is to make this painless for distributors. > Are we still getting seg faults or other serious problems? Yes we are, but things are starting to slow down. It needs a lot more exercise. You know what might be helpful here? I could make some "bleeding edge" static builds of the latest code, and then we could put out a call for testers on the command-line list. Not having to do a song and dance to build all of this software from git would make life easier for some would-be bug hunters. Maybe I'll get to the point where I keep two sets of statics: one that is "stable", and the other that is rebuilt from the latest code as often as possible. > Maybe have js off by default in the first windows port. Yes, this is fine with me. > but will it be feasible to maintain an edbrowse.exe along with our statics, Sure it will, but I need someone to build it for me and to keep the Windows build in sync with everything else. -- Chris _______________________________________________ Edbrowse-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.the-brannons.com/mailman/listinfo/edbrowse-dev
